Enhancing Human-Nature Connection in Local Landscape Design through Communicative Planning and Dialogue (Case Study: Sormagh City, Fars Province, Iran)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Environmental Design Engineering, University of Tehran; Lecturer at Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Planning and Management, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This study investigates the role of values, cultural roots, and local knowledge in the landscape design of Sormagh City, Fars Province. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, the research draws upon theories of communicative planning, dialogue, and choice theory to propose strategies for restoring and enhancing the connection between younger generations and nature, while preserving local identity and cultural heritage. The research employs a qualitative and interpretive methodology, centered on conducting dialogue-based and informal sessions with local residents, particularly the elderly, to extract values, experiences, and indigenous patterns of resource management. The findings reveal key strategies, including active participation of local communities, multisensory engagement in design, avoidance of Westernized models, and the implementation of comprehensive educational programs. Practical solutions such as the development of natural play areas, community gardens, sustainable energy gardens, sensory gardens, and micro-nature spaces are also presented. The outcomes of this research contribute to advancing participatory design methods and fostering deeper human-nature connections in local landscape projects. Ultimately, the study seeks to enhance quality of life and facilitate the preservation and revitalization of cultural and environmental identity within communities. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bond, A. J., & Morrison-Saunders, A., (2011). Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: Aligning the vision and the practice. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31(1), 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.007
Davidoff, P., & Reiner, T.A., (1962). A choice theory of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366208979427
Davidoff, P., (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187
Faryadi, S., (2018). A storytelling planning process to transform environmental values into sustainable cities and sustainable behaviours. Space Ontology International Journal 7(4), 1- 12. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23456450.2018.7.4.1.5
Faryadi, S., Radaei, M., (2019). Applying storytelling as a communicative planning tool for understanding and interpreting environmental values - Yazd Province, Iran. Journal of Environmental Research 10(19), 219-233. (In Persian) https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1398.10.19.33.1  
Faryadi, Shahrzad, (2023), Planning and Environmental Theories, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Ferguson, S.D., (1999). Communication planning: An integrated approach. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233352
Friedmann, J., (1989). Planning In the public domain: Discourse and praxis. Journal of Planning Education and Research 8(2), 128–130. https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0739456X8900800214
Friedmann, J., (2008). The uses of planning theory: A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28(2), 247–257. https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0739456X08325220
Frimpong Boamah, E., (2023). Planning as polycentric: Institutionalist lessons for communicative and collaborative planning in Global South contexts. Journal of Planning Theory 22(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221115871
Golchin, P., Kafi, M., & Sarani, N., (2021). A survey on the significance of designing the healing gardens in campuses sites to enhance spatial desirability: The case of University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 23(10), 103-118. (In Persian) http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jest.2019.44644.4684
Golchin, P., Narouei, B., & Masnavi, M.R., (2012). Evaluating Visual Quality of Educational Campus Based on Users Preferences: The Case of Sistan and Balouchestan University, Iran. Journal of Environmental Studies 38(2), 135-150. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2012.29109
Innes, J.E., & Booher, D. E., (2015). A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses.  Planning Theory Journal 14(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213519356
Innes, J.E., & Booher, D.E., (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. Journal of Planning Theory and Practice 11(4), 201-2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147949
Innes, J.E., (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9501400307
Jahandari, K., & Schwartz, P., (1993). Historical Geography of Fars. Tehran: Association of Cultural Works and Honors Press. Vol. 1. (In Persian)
Jalali, R., (2012). Sampling in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences 1(4), 310-320. (In Persian)https://sid.ir/paper/215407/fa    
Khalilnejad, S.M., & Golchin, P., (2021). Evaluating the preferences and level of participation of the academic community in urban agriculture: the case of University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Journal of Environmental Sciences 19(3), 193-216. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.52547/envs.2021.37159
Krumholz, N., (1990). Making equity planning work: leadership in the public sector. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lin, Y., (2023). Rethinking collaborative planning in China: Does the communicative or agonistic planning theory matter? Journal of Planning Theory 22(3), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221122283
Maakerani, H. M., (2007). The Application of Habermas's theory of communicative action in urban palnning: opponents and proponents. Philosophy.
Machler, L., & Milz, D., (2015). The Evolution of Communicative Planning Theory
Mattila, H., (2019). Habermas revisited: Resurrecting the contested roots of communicative planning theory. Journal of Progress in Planning 141(1), Article 100431, 1-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001
Mullenbach, L.E., (2022). Critical discourse analysis of urban park and public space development. Journal of Cities 120(2), 103458.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103458.
Norouzi, A., & Nastaran, M., (2014). Planning Children's Play Spaces or Urban Playgrounds: Examining the Necessity, Planning Principles, and Location Selection at the Neighborhood Level. Isfahan: Jihad Daneshgahi Press, Isfahan Unit (Volume 1). (In Persian)
Raaphorst, K., Duchhart, Ingrid., Van der Knaap, Wim., Roeleveld, G., & Van den Brink, A., (2016). The semiotics of landscape design communication: towards a critical visual research approach in landscape architecture. Journal of Landscape Research, 42(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1257706
Rafieian, M., & Maroufi, S., (2012).Theoretical application of collaborative planning in new urban planning theories. Journal of Armanshahr 4(7), 113-120. (In Persian)
Ranjbar, H., Haghdoost, A. A., Salsali, M., Khoshdel, A., Soleimani, M. A., & Bahrami, N., (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A Gguide for beginners. Journal of the Army University of Medical Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran 10(3), 238-250. (In Persian) https://sid.ir/paper/96654/fa
Reza Ali Morad Afshari, R., (2013). Analysis of sustainable architecture in Iranian garden design (Case Study: Fin Garden of Kashan). The First National Conference on Architecture, Restoration, Urbanism, and Sustainable Environment, Hamedan, Iran. (In Persian)https://civilica.com/doc/263330
Saboya, R.T., (2019). Urban planning as collective, progressive, interrelated and path-dependent decision making. Journal of Revista Políticas Públicas & Cidades 8(3), 5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.23900/2359-1552v8n3_4
Sager, T., (2022). Advocacy planning: Were expectations fulfilled? Journal of Planning Perspectives 37(6), 1205–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2040189
Sanoff, H., (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. John Wiley & Sons.
Schlater, J.D., & Sontag, M.S., (1994). Toward the measurement of human values. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 23(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X940231002
Sotomayor, L., & Daniere, A., (2018). The dilemmas of equity planning in the Global South: A comparative view from Bangkok and Medellín. Journal of Planning Education and Research 38(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17700495
Statistical Center of Iran, (2017). Selected Results of the 2017 National Population and Housing Census. (In Persian)
Sumares, D., Fidélis, T., (2011). Natura 2000 and the narrative nature of nature: a case for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 8(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2011.556649
Udy, J., (1980). Why plan? Planning and the eternal values. Journal of Plan Canada 20, 176-183.
Vahidzadegan, F., & Irani Behabahani, H., (2012). Designing urban green spaces as thematic gardens: A model for the Persian Garden city. Second Conference on Environmental Planning and Management, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/147506
Westin, M., (2022). The framing of power in communicative planning theory: Analysing the work of John Forester, Patsy Healey and Judith Innes. Journal of Planning Theory 21(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952211043219
Zhang, L., Lu, J., Shi, X., & Liao, L., (2024). From rational planning to communicative planning: Exploring the roles of responsible planners in Beijing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2370897
Zhao, N., Wang, J., & Liu, Y., (2024). Institutionalization of public interest in planning: Evolving mechanisms of public representation in China’s urban regeneration policymaking. Journal of Planning Theory 23(3), 219-242.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952231206418
Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement
Volume 15, Issue 55
June 2025
Pages 131-156

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 January 2025
  • Revise Date: 22 March 2025
  • Accept Date: 12 April 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics