نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان
2 کارشناس ارشد جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In the present age, considering the growth and development of the cities , the urbanism issues and concepts such as city and citizenship have become the most important issues affecting human life in quantitative and qualitative dimensions, Therefore, they are addressing new urban development theories such as the city, with goals such as solving urban problems, improving the quality of life in the city, the efficiency of urban management and city leadership towards the side of more desirability, with respect to local and local values more than before .The purpose of this study was to investigate and evaluate the livability status of the five districts of Zahedan from the citizen's point of view.The nature of this study is descriptive-analytical and is of applied one. Data collection was done using a questionnaire. To determine the sample size, Cochran formula was used and the population of the sample was 400 people. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software and regression analysis, T-test, and one-sample T-test and in order to evaluate the viability and ranking of 5 areas in Zahedan, Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The findings show that the income variable with a beta value of 0.322 has the most effect on satisfaction of residents of Zahedan from the indicators of survival. The results of one-sample T test indicate that the overall mean of indices of survival was 2.67 And lower than average. Among the dimensions studied, the social dimension with an average of 3.23 is moderate and has a more favorable situation; however, with regard to the significance level which is higher than 0.05,and from the statistical view is not a meaning relationship And it is not possible to generalize this result to the whole society ", while the economic dimension with an average of" 2.54 " urban challenges with an average of" 2.64 and "urban infrastructure with an average of 2.50 less Are moderate and undesirable. The results of Kruskal-Wallis test show that among the 5 regions of Zahedan, region 1 with an average rating of 243.83, has the highest viability, in contrast, region 4 with an average rating of 137.33, has the least viability in 5th districts of Zahedan city.
کلیدواژهها [English]
32- Cedar Hill MunicipaliTy (2008), CiTy of Cedar Hill comprehensive Plan 2008, chapTer 5: LivabiliTy, PP. 5-1 To 5-20.
33- Lennard, H, L. (1997), “principles for The livable ciTy” in lennard, S.H, S von ungernsTernberg, lennard, eds. making ciTies livably. InTernaTional making ciTies livably conferences. California, USA: Gondolier press.
34- Lang, RoberT. (2003),“Edgless CiTies: exploring The elusive meTropolis” WashingTon: Brookings InsTiTuTe Press.
35- Landry, C., (2000), Urban ViTaliTy: A New source of Urban CompeTiTiveness, prince claus fund journal, ARCHIS issue Urban ViTaliTy Urban Heroes.
36- saitluanga Benjamin L(2014), "spatial pattern of urban Livability in Himalayan Region: A case of Aizawl city, india", social Indicators Research, Volume 117, Issue 2, PP 541-559.
37- Kotus, Jacek & Rzeszewski, Michal(2013), "Between disorder and Livability.Case of one street in Post-socialist city", Cities, Volume 32,PP 123-134.
38- Mahmoudi, Mohadeseh؛ Ahmad, Faizah؛ Abbasi, Bushra(2015), "Livable streets: the effects of physical problems on the quality and Livability of Kuala Lumpur streets", Cities, volume 43, PP 104-114.
)
